climate change | DaKript

Hi,

This time, let's discuss the terminology being introduced by regulators around the world relating to crypto assets. More specifically, "unhosted wallets". Why?

It is a systematic attack by regulators and politicians in the Western world, who are using terminology to deceive the uneducated people and to present one of the key elements of the sovereign management of money as something bad.

"Unhosted wallets are wallets that are managed by you and no one else. There is no third party that you need to trust or ask for permission to access or transfer funds. A more appropriate and established term is self-hosted (private) wallet. To bring this into the fiat world, we can call it a cash wallet. So, we are talking about cash in your pocket that is yours and yours alone. You can spend it on anything, without the need to ask anyone for permission. Anonymous.

It is not surprising that surveillance systems want to restrict and eliminate cash, because cash does not allow them to control people and spending. The same applies to unhosted wallets. It eliminates control systems and allows the individual to manage funds sovereignly, pseudonymously.

In the near future, the mass media will try to convince you that hosted wallets are normal. A must-have and a guarantee of security. The truth is anything but that.

Avoid hosted wallets (aka custodial wallets). They work in the same way as bank accounts. The funds are never yours and you are dependent on the permission of a third party. Only cash and private (non-custodial, self-hosted) crypto wallets enable you to be sovereign and free.

Bitcoin is not krypto

Wanna know why? Read what Tomer Strolight has to say here.

Climate changes

What more than 1.000 scientists has to say, not politicians? Read

Zoltan Pozsar on the causes of the global crisis

This time, Zoltan explains why the current situation has emerged and why nothing will ever be the same again. Russia and China are breaking free from the clutches of the West and setting new standards for world order. Recommended reading.

A documentary for the lazy ones

If you don't feel like reading books and articles about Bitcoin, then you need to watch this documentary.

In the flood of information, signals, it is difficult to extract the gist

Jeff Booth will help you. But only if you read it.

Why we need a monetary constant

Alex Svetski outlines the reasons why a monetary constant is urgently needed and why Bitcoin can fill the gap. More

Year 1981

Ufffff, sound familiar? Check it out

Freedom and privacy

How are they linked and why is there no freedom without privacy? Mr @dergigi explains why.

How do we make sure privacy is protected online?

A guide on how to keep your online privacy. If you're wondering why we need it at all, read the article above. Instructions

Elon Musk's Starlink enables further decentralisation of Bitcoin

With Starlink internet connectivity, bitcoin mining will be possible in locations where it was not possible before. More

The political narrative on that humans are causing most or all of climate change, and the claim that the science behind this notion is "coherent", has been dealt a severe blow with the publication of the "World Climate Declaration" (WCD), signed by more than 1100 scientists and experts. The authors, who come from all over the world and are led by Norwegian Nobel Prize-winning physicist Professor Ivar Giaever, argue that the climate situation is not critical. Climate science has turned into a debate based on beliefs rather than sound science.

Since the world emerged from the "Little Ice Age" around 1850, it has warmed significantly less than the IPCC predicted based on modelled human impacts. "The gap between the real world and the modelled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change," the WCD concludes.

In Italy, Professor Antonino Zichichi, together with 48 local science professors, recently declared that human responsibility for climate change is "unjustifiably exaggerated and that catastrophic predictions are not realistic". In their scientific view, "natural changes explain a significant part of the global warming observed since 1850".

WCD document

Climate models have many shortcomings and are far from credible as a global policy tool. They magnify the impact of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, but do not take into account any positive effects. CO2 is not a pollutant. "It is essential for all life on Earth. More CO2 is good for nature because it greens the Earth; the extra CO2 in the air has stimulated the growth of the world's plant biomass. It is also good for agriculture, increasing crop yields around the world.

Scientists explain that there is no statistical evidence that global worming is making hurricanes, floods, droughts and similar natural disasters more frequent or more severe. "There is no climate emergency," the declaration adds.

Source